On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 5:50 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > I agree. I assumed that when Simon was talking about removing > allow_standalone_primary, he meant making the code always behave as if > it were turned OFF.
I feel the same thing.. Despite his saying, the patch implements sync_replication_timeout_client, and if its value is too large, the primary behaves like "wait-forever". Though the primary behaves like "standalone" only when it's started first without connected standbys. So if we have sync_replication_timeout_client, allow_standalone_primary looks no longer useful. Regards, -- Fujii Masao NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION NTT Open Source Software Center -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
