On 3/9/11 10:11 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> If you are storing xml in an xml column just to get it
>> validated, and doing no processing in the DB, then you'd probably
>> prefer our current representation. If you want to build functional
>> indexes on xpath expressions, and then run queries that extract data
>> using other xpath expressions, you would probably prefer the other
>> representation.
Then I think the answer is that we need both data types. One for
text-XML and one for binary-XML.
For my part, I don't use PostgreSQL's native XML tools for storage of
XML data because the xpath functions are too slow and limited to make PG
useful as an XML database.
--
-- Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://www.pgexperts.com
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
