On Fri, 2011-03-18 at 08:27 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 6:00 PM, Jeff Davis <pg...@j-davis.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-03-16 at 13:35 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> >> 2. If a query cancel interrupt is received (pg_cancel_backend or ^C),
> >> then cancel the sync rep wait and issue a warning before acknowledging
> >> the commit.
> >
> > When I saw this commit, I noticed that the WARNING doesn't have an
> > errcode(). It seems like it should -- this is the kind of thing that the
> > client is likely to care about, and may want to handle specially.
>
> Should I invent ERRCODE_WARNING_TRANSACTION_NOT_REPLICATED?
I think it's reasonable to invent a new code here. Perhaps use the word
"synchronous" rather than "replicated", though?
Regards,
Jeff Davis
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
