On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 8:33 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > The correct question is whether we're ready for beta, and I would say > the answer is clearly no, unless you have a pretty low standard for what > "ready for beta" means. Perhaps it would be suitable to discuss what > the standard for that really ought to be; but I don't agree in the > slightest that we ought to decide based on predetermined calendar dates > rather than the state of the code.
Agreed. I think some discussion of which of the things on the open item lists need to be done before beta might be helpful, and we ought to add any items that are not there but are blockers. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
