On Mar 26, 2011, at 4:27 AM, Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > The basic point of this post was this: If we wait for the Open Items > list to drop to zero, many people are unable to contribute and that > means delay. Also, waiting for the Open Items list to drop to zero > puts the schedule in the hands of one or two individuals, which is a > bad thing.
As far as I can tell, everyone is just as free to make suggestions and review patches right as now as they always are. In fact, I do not particularly enjoy slogging through this list of open items. I would be more than happy to have more help. There are plenty of issues there that require real thought, and work, and I have no particular desire to be the one that fixes them all. You seem to feel that these issues are quite subjective and that the right behavior is altogether unclear. I disagree. There are a few things that may fall into that category, but I think for the most part we're fixing bugs and major usability problems. ...Robert -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
