On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 4:04 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: >>> I've added code for you. > >> Your skepticism seems out of place. I actually hit this problem in testing. >> We could debate how realistic my test setup was, but why? It is not our >> policy - and bad practice in general - to ship code with race conditions. >> The code you added is not "for me"; it's "to fix a race condition". > > In particular, in view of today's fix, shouldn't this commit be reverted? > > http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb?p=postgresql.git;a=commitdiff;h=6e8e7cc580665ddd43c8ca2acc6d60f345570a57 > > I thought at the time that that was nothing more than documenting a > known bug, and now it is documenting a dead bug.
No, that doc change is still accurate. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
