Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 4:04 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> In particular, in view of today's fix, shouldn't this commit be reverted?
>>
>> http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb?p=postgresql.git;a=commitdiff;h=6e8e7cc580665ddd43c8ca2acc6d60f345570a57
>>
>> I thought at the time that that was nothing more than documenting a
>> known bug, and now it is documenting a dead bug.
> No, that doc change is still accurate.
Well, in that case, it should be on the open-items list. If the system
is still behaving that way, it's a bug.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
