On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 11:55 PM, Greg Stark <gsst...@mit.edu> wrote:
> Also, for what it's worth I prefer thinking of > synchronous_commit/synchronous_replication as one big multi-way > variable: > > synchronous_commit = memory | disk | replica-memory | replica-disk | > replica-visible That's close enough to my thinking for me to say yes to. I'd prefer to call it "commit_durability" though. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
