Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > We also need to consider the issue raised elsewhere - that a naive > implementation of this could allow the commit to become visible on > the standby before it becomes visible on the master. That would > be expensive to prevent, because you'd need an additional set of > master-standby interlocks, but I think at least one person was > arguing that it was necessary for correctness - my memory of the > details is fuzzy at the moment. I remember expressing concern about that; I don't know if anyone else did. After some discussion, I was persuaded that the use cases where it would matter are narrow enough that documentation of the issue should be enough. -Kevin
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
