On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 8:54 AM, Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 1:14 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> but there is certainly no >> open item for adding additional sync rep modes. > > In your opinion.
Well, as you just pointed out yourself a few minutes ago, I did write the open item in question... I fancy I knew what I meant. > I would prefer further feedback before solidifying this design, but if > we must solidify it now, then I prefer to do that with all 5 options. > As originally submitted for this commit fest. Even if it were true that these options were in the patch submitted for this CommitFest, that wouldn't be a reason to commit them now, because the CommitFest is over and has been for several weeks. But it turns out they weren't. http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/1295127631.3282.100.camel@ebony +/* + * Queuing code is written to allow later extension to multiple + * queues. Currently, we use just one queue (==FSYNC). + * + * XXX We later expect to have RECV, FSYNC and APPLY modes. + */ -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
