Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> writes:
> I thought about that. What I'd like to know is how many people actually
> want and use and expect the current behaviour. If it's more than a
> handful (which I seriously doubt) then that's probably the way to go.
> Otherwise it seems more trouble than it's worth.
Well, the point here is that "is_member_of" is currently considered
to be a kind of privilege test, and of course superusers should
automatically pass every privilege test. If you want it to not act
that way in some circumstances, we need a fairly clear theory as to
which circumstances it should act which way in.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
