On Apr 24, 2011, at 3:03 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Yeah. It seems like a bad idea if the distribution "name" doesn't > include sufficient information to tell which version it contains. > I had in mind a convention like "distribution version x.y.z always > contains extension version x.y". Seems like minor version versus > major version would be the way to explain that.
Does that apply to PostgreSQL itself? I guess release 9.0.4 contains 9.0. But it's a convention. David -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
