Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> writes: > On mån, 2011-04-25 at 15:26 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> Well, it's not just to be "helpful", it's to close off code paths that >> are never going to be sufficiently well-tested to not have bizarre >> failure modes. That helps both developers (who don't have to worry >> about testing/fixing such code paths) and users (who won't have to >> deal with the bizarre failure modes).
> That's of course another good reason. Hm, does that mean we have consensus on treating it as an error? If not, would some other people care to cast votes? regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers