On 04/25/2011 07:18 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Peter Eisentraut<pete...@gmx.net> writes:
On mån, 2011-04-25 at 15:26 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Well, it's not just to be "helpful", it's to close off code paths that
are never going to be sufficiently well-tested to not have bizarre
failure modes. That helps both developers (who don't have to worry
about testing/fixing such code paths) and users (who won't have to
deal with the bizarre failure modes).
That's of course another good reason.
Hm, does that mean we have consensus on treating it as an error?
If not, would some other people care to cast votes?
+1 for error.
cheers
andrew
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
