On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 9:50 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 8:56 AM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: >> The attached, applied patch checks that the pg_upgrade user specified is >> a super-user. It also reports the error message when the post-pg_ctl >> connection fails. >> >> This was prompted by a private bug report from EnterpriseDB. > > It strikes me that it's fairly crazy to think you're going to be able > to catch all the possible errors the server might throw this way. > Don't we need some way of letting the actual server errors leak out?
Or, hmm. Maybe you just did that. If so, never mind. :-) -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
