Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> writes: > > One question I have is why we even bother to allow the database username > > to be specified? Shouldn't we just hard-code that to 'postgres'? > > Only if you want to render pg_upgrade unusable by a significant fraction > of people. "postgres" is not the hard wired name of the bootstrap > superuser.
I was really wondering if I should be using that hard-coded name, rather than allowing the user to supply it. They have to compile in a different name, and I assume that name is accessible somewhere. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
