On 10 May 2011 09:45, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> I think we need to refactor the function into something like: > > #define WL_LATCH_SET 1 > #define WL_SOCKET_READABLE 2 > #define WL_SOCKET_WRITEABLE 4 > #define WL_TIMEOUT 8 > #define WL_POSTMASTER_DEATH 16 While I agree with the need to not box ourselves into a corner on the latch interface by making sweeping assumptions, isn't the fact that a socket became readable or writable strictly an implementation detail? -- Peter Geoghegan http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
