On 10 May 2011 17:43, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> It should be an anonymous pipe that's inherited by the child process by > rather than a named pipe. Otherwise seems fine to me, as far as this proof > of concept program goes. Alright, thanks. I'll use an anonymous pipe in the patch itself. -- Peter Geoghegan http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
