Christopher Browne <cbbro...@gmail.com> writes:
> On 2011-05-30 4:31 PM, "Peter Eisentraut" <pete...@gmx.net> wrote:
>> Based on that, and past discussions, and things we've tried in the past,
>> and gut feeling, and so on, it looks like Request Tracker would appear
>> to be the next best thing to consider trying out.  What do people think
>> about that?

> I'd be more optimistic that debbugs, or an adaption thereof, might more
> nearly fit into the workflow.

Yeah, that's my impression as well.

                        regards, tom lane

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to