Christopher Browne <cbbro...@gmail.com> writes: > On 2011-05-30 4:31 PM, "Peter Eisentraut" <pete...@gmx.net> wrote: >> Based on that, and past discussions, and things we've tried in the past, >> and gut feeling, and so on, it looks like Request Tracker would appear >> to be the next best thing to consider trying out. What do people think >> about that?
> I'd be more optimistic that debbugs, or an adaption thereof, might more > nearly fit into the workflow. Yeah, that's my impression as well. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers