Tom Lane wrote: > Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> writes: > > That doesn't mean that better integration cannot be worked on later, but > > this illusion that a bug tracker must have magical total awareness of > > the entire flow of information in the project from day one is an > > illusion and has blocked this business for too long IMO. > > If it has only a partial view of the set of bugs being worked on, it's > not going to meet the goals that are being claimed for it.
The problem with a bug tracker that only tracks some bugs is that people will mistakenly believe the system is complete, when it is not. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
