On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 14:44, Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> wrote: > > > On 05/31/2011 06:41 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote: >> >> We already have a search system that works reasonably well for the >> archives... >> > > I trust this weas a piece of sarcasm. I spoke to more than a few people at > pgcon and nobody had a good word to say about the search system on the > archives.
Well, it's tsearch. And I've heard nobody say anything else than that it's *a lot* better than what we had before. But sure, it can probably be improved. But what people are then basically asying is that tsearch isn't good enough for searching. Which is too bad, but may be so, and in that case we need to fix *that*, rather than build Yet Another Service To Do The Same Thing Slightly Differently. -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/ -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
