On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 09:36:00AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> writes: > > On 05/31/2011 06:41 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote: > >> We already have a search system that works reasonably well for the > >> archives... > > > I trust this weas a piece of sarcasm. I spoke to more than a few people > > at pgcon and nobody had a good word to say about the search system on > > the archives. > > Please note, though, that there is no bug tracker anywhere whose search > mechanism doesn't suck as much or more. If you're unhappy with the > search stuff the solution is to improve it, not bring in another bad > mechanism. > +1
Ken -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
