Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of lun jun 06 12:10:24 -0400 2011: > Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> writes:
> > Hmm interesting. I don't think the placement suggested by Tom would be > > useful, because the Zabbix backends are particularly busy all the time, > > so they wouldn't run ProcessCatchupEvent at all. > > Yeah, I wasn't that thrilled with the suggestion either. But we can't > just have backends constantly closing every open FD they hold, or > performance will suffer. I don't see any very good place to do this... How about doing something on an sinval message for pg_database? That doesn't solve the WAL problem Kevin found, of course ... -- Álvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
