Alvaro Herrera <[email protected]> wrote: > That doesn't solve the WAL problem Kevin found, of course ... I wouldn't worry about that too much -- the WAL issue is self-limiting and not likely to ever cause a failure. The biggest risk is that every now and then some new individual will notice it and waste a bit of time investigating. The LO issue, on the other hand, could easily eat enough disk to cause a failure. -Kevin
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
