On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 6:33 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 1:27 PM, Joshua Berkus <j...@agliodbs.com> wrote: >> As long as we have solidarity of the committers that this is not allowed, >> however, this is not a real problem. And it appears that we do. In the >> future, it shouldn't even be necessary to discuss it. > > Solidarity? > > Simon - who was a committer last time I checked - seems to think that > the current process is entirely bunko.
I'm not sure why anyone that disagrees with you should be accused of wanting to junk the whole process. I've not said that and I don't think this. Before you arrived, it was quite normal to suggest tuning patches after feature freeze. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
