On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 9:00 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: >> Moving on from that, I have proposed other solutions. Koichi, Jignesh >> and and then Robert have shown measurements of the huge contention in >> this area of our software. Robert's patch addresses the problems, as >> do Koichi's and my latest patch. I would like to see us do >> *something* about these problems for 9.1. Not all of them are risky or >> time consuming. > > In the first place, all of these issues predate 9.1 by years. They are > not regressions or new bugs, and they have not suddenly gotten more > urgent. In the second place, I haven't seen any proposals in the area > that appear low risk. I seriously doubt that I would consider *any* > meaningful change in the locking area to be low risk.
That's a shame. We'll fix it in 9.2 then. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
