"Kevin Grittner" <kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov> writes:
> The other pending patch relates to the false positives serialization
> failures and funny-looking pg_lock entries from not ignoring
> non-MVCC snapshots in SSI. I don't think Dan had any problem with
> the patch I offered, but I wasn't sure what to do about two
> functions. He researched that and proposed a way to handle those.
> That looked good to me on a first pass except that there was one
> line he left at NULL instead of plugging in the snapshot. That looks
> like an easily-fixed oversight. It will take me about an hour to
> review his changes in detail and re-test everything, although I
> don't expect any other issues. It seems odd not to include a change
> that was requested by Tom, Robert, and Heikki (and which Dan and I
> both put in the hours to have a patch before beta2) in beta2.
Well, Heikki is lead committer for SSI; anything he's comfortable
with pushing in today, he should push. Just keep in mind that it
is too late to get a full buildfarm cycle in before beta2 wraps...
so anything that goes in today had better be low-risk.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
