Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > Kevin Grittner <kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov> wrote: >> There is this pending patch, without which there are infrequent >> conditions under which the users could get a LOG level message >> and accumulate files in pg_serial: >> http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/4dee7be4020000250003e...@gw.wicourts.gov > > That seems important to fix. It seems a lot more important to me than the other SSI issues. > In any case, if this misses beta2, I'm not feeling like we'd need > to push beta3 just for that reason. I'm not even 100% convinced > that it needs to be in 9.1. We're talking about fixing a > relatively rare false positive from a system which by its design > necessitates that users be prepared for the possibility of false > positives. Yeah, I was actually surprised that people felt it needed to go into 9.1, rather than being on a list of 9.2 follow-up improvements. Of course, now that it's done, I'd like to see it get into the release; but not at the cost of slipping the date.. -Kevin
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
