On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 10:44 PM, David E. Wheeler <da...@kineticode.com> wrote:
> I was reading the partitioning docs when I spotted this. I think it means to
> highlight the advantages of DROP TABLE over DELETE rather than ALTER TABLE.
>
> Best,
>
> David
>
> diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/ddl.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/ddl.sgml
> index 4c9fc5d..0cdb800 100644
> *** a/doc/src/sgml/ddl.sgml
> --- b/doc/src/sgml/ddl.sgml
> *************** VALUES ('New York', NULL, NULL, 'NY');
> *** 2332,2338 ****
> <para>
> Bulk loads and deletes can be accomplished by adding or removing
> partitions, if that requirement is planned into the partitioning
> design.
> ! <command>ALTER TABLE</> is far faster than a bulk operation.
> It also entirely avoids the <command>VACUUM</command>
> overhead caused by a bulk <command>DELETE</>.
> </para>
> --- 2332,2338 ----
> <para>
> Bulk loads and deletes can be accomplished by adding or removing
> partitions, if that requirement is planned into the partitioning
> design.
> ! <command>DROP TABLE</> is far faster than a bulk operation.
> It also entirely avoids the <command>VACUUM</command>
> overhead caused by a bulk <command>DELETE</>.
> </para>
That looks weird. I'm sure that *used* to say DROP TABLE.
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
