Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of mar jun 14 13:04:30 -0400 2011: > Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> writes: > > Done that way (9.0 and beyond). > > Re-reading the actual commit, I notice that there's now a grammatical > problem: the following sentence says > > It also entirely avoids the <command>VACUUM</command> > overhead caused by a bulk <command>DELETE</>. > > which was okay when "it" referred to "ALTER TABLE", but now that there > are two commands mentioned in the previous sentence, it doesn't match. > Perhaps "These commands also avoid the ...".
Yeah, fixed. -- Álvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
