Excerpts from Greg Sabino Mullane's message of jue jun 16 15:33:35 UTC 2011: > > Hash: RIPEMD160 > > >> Or perhaps pg_connections. Yes, +1 to making things fully backwards > >> compatible by keeping pg_stat_activity around but making a better > >> designed and better named table (view/SRF/whatever). > > > I thought about that too when reading the thread the first time, but > > "pg_stat_sessions" sounds better. Our documentation also primarily refers > > to a > > database connection as a "session", i think. > > No, this is clearly connections, not sessions. At least based on the items > in the postgresql.conf file, especially max_connections (probably one of the > items most closely associated with pg_stat_activity)
That doesn't include autovacuum, though, whereas the new view would. -- Álvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
