Josh Kupershmidt <schmi...@gmail.com> writes: > Hmph, looks like buildfarm members koi and jaguar are failing make check now: > > http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=koi&dt=2011-06-22%2008%3A06%3A00
> due to a difference in sequence.out. I didn't muck with the part about > SELECT * FROM foo_seq_new; > which is causing the diff, but it looks like the only difference is in > the log_cnt column, which seems pretty fragile to rely on in a > regression test. Maybe those SELECTS just shouldn't include log_cnt. We've been around on this before: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2008-08/msg01359.php The eventual solution was bb3f839bfcb396c3066a31559d3a72ef0b4b5fae, which is not consistent with what Robert just did, in fact he forgot about that variant output file altogether (which probably means we'll still get occasional failure reports). That previous approach of adding extra expected files isn't going to scale nicely if there are multiple places at risk ... but do we need multiple places selecting the sequence contents? I remain of the opinion that just omitting the value isn't good testing policy. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
