On 24 June 2011 03:48, Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> wrote: > I have touched next_token() and next_token_expand() a bit more, because > it seemed to me that they could be simplified further (the bit about > returning the comma in the token, instead of being a boolean return, > seemed strange). Please let me know what you think.
Cool. I didn't like the way it returned the comma either, but I thought it would be best if I kept the changes in my patch to a minimum. Cheers, BJ -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
