Excerpts from Pavel Stehule's message of mar jun 21 11:04:11 -0400 2011: > 2011/6/21 Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us>:
> > AFAICS, this is only important in places where the syntax allows either > > a keyword or an identifier. If only a keyword is possible, there is no > > value in rejecting it because it's quoted. And, when you do the test, > > I think you'll find that it would be breaking hba files that used to > > work (though admittedly, it's doubtful that there are any such in the > > field). > > It should be better documented. I don't think so this is good > solution, but this is not too important. On the contrary -- we should support it but not document it. I mean, what good would that do? If someone is so silly to uselessly quote keywords, let them do it, but let's not encourage it. -- Álvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
