On tor, 2011-06-30 at 09:42 +0900, Tatsuo Ishii wrote: > Why don't you worry about message translations then? Translation is a > human process and there's no way to guaranteer the translation is > perfect.
At least for message translations we have a process and sophisticated tools that ensure that the translation has been done and when and by whom. If you create additional translation maintenance effort, then if you could integrate that into the existing PO-based system, I'm sure the objections would be less (or different). And another important point: the PO-based system never shows outdated translations to the user. But if we're adding another step to the release preparation where someone has to chase down half a dozen people to update some file, that creates a lot more burden and bottlenecks, including the possibility to hold up minor releases or having to remove files in minor releases. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
