On Sunday, July 03, 2011 09:18:52 PM Magnus Hagander wrote: > On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 20:04, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: > > On Sunday, July 03, 2011 06:46:15 PM Tom Lane wrote: > >> A look at the git-notes man page says that you can only have one note > >> per commit, but you can edit that note, and git does track the revision > >> history of each note. > > I don't think its that hard to write a hook which allows notes changes > > for a different set of people than source changes. > > Whether the people wanting to annotate commits are ok with using git I do > > not know. > > If you want a different group of people to maintain it, then why force > it into the same repository in the first place? Having to write hooks > to work around things with that seems to be solving the wrong problem, > imho. Because imho the information who worked on a patch belongs alongside the patch. I can't forsee a really useful usage of that information without the commit alongside...
Andres -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
