Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes: > Anyone have an opinion about that?
I still have this application where PREPARE takes between 50ms and 300ms and EXECUTE 5ms to 10ms, and I can handle 1 PREPARE for 10000 EXECUTE quite easily. (Yes the database fits in RAM, and yes when that's no longer the case we just upgrade the hardware) What does your proposal mean for such a use case? Regards, -- Dimitri Fontaine http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
