On Wed, 2011-08-03 at 13:07 -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > A little OT here, but (as I think Simon said elsewhere) I think we > really ought to be considering the table statistics when deciding > whether or not to replan. It seems to me that the overwhelmingly > common case where this is going to come up is when (some subset of) > the MCVs require a different plan than run-of-the-mill values. It > would be nice to somehow work that out.
That blurs the line a little bit. It sounds like this might be described as "incremental planning", and perhaps that's a good way to think about it. Regards, Jeff Davis -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers