On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 16:12, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> writes: >> Accidentally specifying an IPv6 address in pg_hba.conf on a system >> that doesn't have ipv6 support gives the following error: > >> LOG: specifying both host name and CIDR mask is invalid: "::1/128" > >> Which is obviously wrong, because I didn't do that. Do we need to >> detect and special-case ipv6 addresses in this case? > > Doesn't really seem worth going out of our way for that. Systems with > no IPv6 support are a dying breed, and will be more so by the time 9.2 > gets deployed.
Well, I got this on a win64 build. It's *supposed* to have ipv6. I wonder if it breaks on windows just because there is no ipv6 address on the machine... Unfortunately I shut the machine down and won't have time to test more right now, but I'll try to figure that out later unless beaten to it... -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/ -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
