On ons, 2011-08-17 at 13:12 -0400, charles.mcdev...@emc.com wrote: > > On tis, 2011-08-16 at 16:17 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: > > > Well, I got this on a win64 build. It's *supposed* to have ipv6. I > > > wonder if it breaks on windows just because there is no ipv6 address > > > on the machine... > > > > It would mean that getaddrinfo() of "::1" failed. That seems weird. > > > > A system admin can set registry keys to disable IPv6, either partially > (allowing ::1), or totally (all IPv6 addresses fail). > > If the system has IPv6 enabled, it's not possible for there to be no ipv6 > address. There is always the link-local address of each LAN adapter.
The problem here is that the system cannot *parse* the address "::1". This should not have anything to do with which addresses exist or could exist. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
