Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> writes:
> On 09/02/2011 06:37 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> It won't work, unless you have a solution for fixing the paths of the
>> shared library modules used by the regression tests.
> Well, we could drop those functions and not run tests that require them.
> Or we could possibly install the libraries in $libdir and hack pg_proc
> accordingly. We'd have to install them on both the source and
> destination branches, of course.
The only one that's problematic is pg_regress.so; contrib modules are
already installed in $libdir. I still think that installing
pg_regress.so in $libdir may be the most reasonable solution, assuming
that the delta involved isn't too great. Yeah, we would have to
back-patch the changes into every release branch we want to test
upgrading from, but how risky is that really? The *only* thing it
affects is the regression tests.
Maybe I should produce a draft patch for moving pg_regress.so that way,
and we could see how big a delta it really is.
> Maybe we need to develop a test db specifically for pg_upgrade anyway.
Possibly, but it'll always be more impoverished than the regular
regression test DBs IMO.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
