On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 2:02 PM, Andy Colson <a...@squeakycode.net> wrote: > Taking into account Noah's and Greg's "Displaying accumulated autovacuum > cost" patch is also sending to logs, do we all now agree that this is proper > way?
My general impression of the thread is that nobody really wants to reject the patch (because we all know that we need a lot more logging options than we currently have) but at the same time nobody seems quite certain why someone would want to look at this precise bit of information. I mean, it's already possible to get log messages at the start and end of a checkpoint, so there's no problem with finding out whether a checkpoint was in progress at the time something was slow. In fact, you can even figure out which phase of the checkpoint you were in. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
