On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 9:14 AM, Joshua D. Drake <j...@commandprompt.com> wrote: > > On 09/14/2011 05:12 AM, Hannu Krosing wrote: >> >> On Tue, 2011-09-13 at 10:26 -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote: >> >>>> Complete isolation at the user level, allowing an ISP to support >>>> multiple independent customers on a server without having to fiddle with >>>> multiple back ends each running on a separate port, a feature that MySQL >>>> has had for as far back as I can recall, and one of the reasons ISPs are >>>> more likely to offer MySQL than PostgreSQL. >>> >>> Now this would definitely be nice. It is frustrating that we don't have >>> per database users. >> >> Hmm, what does the GUC db_user_namespace do then ? >> >> it says "Enables per-database user names." > > Last I checked (it has been a few years) that was at best, a hack. I > remember either I or David Fetter? Writing about some issues with it on list > but it was a long time ago. >
last time i tried it (last year), it seems broken because i couldn't log in with any user anymore... but it could be that i did something wrong so i didn't report until i could confirm but i hadn't the time and i forgot it since then -- Jaime Casanova www.2ndQuadrant.com Professional PostgreSQL: Soporte 24x7 y capacitación -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
