On Wed, 2002-07-03 at 08:20, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote: > > Of course, a shared memory system probably is going to either do it > > sequentailly or have its own index issues, so I don't see a huge > > advantage to going to shared memory, and I do see extra code and a queue > > limit. > > Is a shared memory implementation going to play silly buggers with the Win32 > port?
Perhaps this is a good place to introduce anonymous mmap ? Is there a way to grow anonymous mmap on demand ? ---------------- Hannu ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
