Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Tom Lane wrote: > >> themselves. (I'd also be inclined to include the hash code in the > >> transmitted message, so that readers could more quickly ignore > >> uninteresting messages.) > > > Doesn't seem worth it, and how would the user know their hash; > > This is not the user's problem; it is the writing backend's > responsibility to compute and add the hash. Basically we trade off some > space to compute the hash code once at the writer not N times at all the > readers.
Oh, OK. When you said "transmitted", I thought you meant transmitted to the client. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
