> > No, he only breaks even for client cleanliness --- either approach > > *will* require changes in clients that look at pg_attribute. > > Uh, Christopher already indicated three clients, psql, pg_dump, and > another that will not require changes for Hiroshi's approach, but will > require changes for isdropped. That doesn't seem "break even" to me.
And Tom pointed out that I was wrong... Chris ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
