Rod Taylor wrote: > > We could change pg_attribute to another name, and create a view called > > pg_attribute that never returned isdropped columns to the client. That > > would allow clients to work cleanly, and the server to work cleanly. > > Another case where having an informational schema would eliminate the > whole argument -- as the clients wouldn't need to touch the system > tables. > > Any thoughts on that initial commit Peter?
>From my new understanding, the client coders _want_ to see the isdropped row so the attno's are consecutive. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
