On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 4:20 PM, Mark Mielke <m...@mark.mielke.cc> wrote: > My original read of the problem determined (for me personally) that the only > way one could be in violation of copyright was if the data was incorrect > (i.e. not factual). It presented an interesting contradiction. The only way > they could sue is by agreeing that their data is faulty and should not be > trusted. :-) > > The case Merlin refers to below seemed to rule that even faulty information > is not a concern.
specifically, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feist_v._Rural merlin -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
