Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of vie oct 14 09:36:47 -0300 2011: > > On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: > > Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> >> Oh, true, we have that, though it's not very usable because you have to > >> rename the file from .psqlrc-9.0.3 to .psqlrc-9.0.4 when you upgrade, > >> which is kinda silly. > > > > True. We don't add configuration changes in minor versions so having > > minor-version granularity makes no sense. > > > > The attached patch changes this to use the _major_ version number for > > psql rc files. Does this have to be backward-compatible? Should I > > check for minor and major matches? That is going to be confusing to > > document. > > Checking for a minor match and then a major match seems sensible. And backwards compatible too! +1 to that. An idea that you can describe in six words doesn't seem all that confusing. -- Álvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
