Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> writes: > > Oops, I see a problem. Right now, our first major release has no zero, > > e.g. 9.2, while our minors have a third digit, 9.2.5. The problem is > > that with this patch it is confusing to have a psql config file that > > matches 9.2.0, but not 9.2.5, because you can't write 9.2.0. > > Uh, this seems like nonsense. We've been labeling major releases with > a dot-zero for some time, and that's embedded in process now (cf > version_stamp.pl) to the point that we're unlikely to forget to do so.
Ah, I see now. 9.1 has: #define PG_VERSION "9.1.0" I rarely see the non-dev trees. No problem then. Patch applied. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers